Что ставить на emil 2
Emil II
Emil II Шведский тяжёлый танк 9 уровня World of Tanks успешно начал путь тестирования на СуперТесте. Тактико-технические характеристики не окончательные, а носят только предварительный характер.
Историческая справка Шведского Emil II
Танк модели EMIL II – это разновидность предыдущей модели Emil 1, однако он более тяжелый и габаритный, вес его составляет от 34 до 39 тонн, что конечно зависит от бронирования и массы двигателя. Что касается самих двигателей для данной модели, то здесь предлагалось два варианта – это 540-й или 665-й.
Это более модернизированная, более востребованная по своему потенциалу модель танка Emil, в производстве которой применялся шведский двигатель, однако, когда производство поставило на поток еще более мощные двигатели, то Emil 2 также отошел на второй план, как и его предшественник Emil 1, а в 1952 году и вовсе был снята с конвейера.
Тут же была представлена следующая модель – это Emil 3, но здесь дела обстояли несколько непонятно: самый мощный танк с массой до 42 тонн был просто нереалистичен, так как для такого не находилось наиболее подходящего двигателя шведского производства.
Все изменилось, когда стали доступны моторы американского производства. Таким образом, создавая третью модель, было кое-что от Emil 2 – это пушка в 150 мм, имеющая гладкоствольный корпус. Тут же было добавлено бронирование по бортовым сторонам и спереди, таким образом, Emil 2 и Emil 1 были полностью вытеснены, а третья модель была принята за основную.
Тактико-технические характеристики Emil II
На тестирование шведский Emil II отправляется со следующими характеристиками:
Оборудование для Шведского Emil II
Первое, что нужно отметить у данного барабанного шведского танка — это его огневая мощь, а она у Emil 2 первостепенна. Также здесь имеются отличные углы наклона, так что, подбирая модули, лучше всего опираться на следующий алгоритм:
• «улучшение вентиляции» — данный модуль позволит ускорить перезарядку барабанной системы, тем более если дополнить «боевым братством» умения экипажа Emil 2;
• «стабилизатор вертикальной наводки» — с данным модулем появится возможность сузить круг наведения орудия и тем самым повысить точность попадания по цели;
• «усиленные приводы наводки» — данный модуль также способствует повышению эффективности действия орудия.
Модуль «Стабилизатор вертикальной настройки» — здесь акцент делается на уменьшение разброса при повороте пушки и движении танка в целом, что в общей сумме составляет 20% улучшения. Особенно стоит выделить уменьшение разброса, так как с таким улучшенным показателем уменьшится и круг сведения, а это указывает на меньшую затрату времени. И еще: выстрел без сведения имеет более высокую точность попадания.Данный модуль предпочтителен для установки на всех боевых танках, в особенности это касается моделей ТТ и СТ. Как правило, владельцы этих машин в основном вступают в активную игру;
Исследование Emil II
Как не странно, но для установки трёх дополнительных модулей в Emil II даже не потребуется исследовать и установить ходовую часть, а поэтому лучше всего поступить следующим образом:
1) установить три дополнительных модуля на танк описанные в подзаголовке ниж;
2) орудие 12 cm akan L/40 за 62 600 опыта (рекомендуем потратить накопленный свободный опыт);
3) двигатель AVS-1195 за 24 700 опыта (с увеличенной мощностью на 115 л.с.);
5) ходовая Emil II 1 b за 24 500 опыта, нужна ли ходовая на танк весьма сомнительно, ведь общая грузоподъемность танка позволяет установить все необходимые модули, а тратить 24 000 опыта для увеличения скорости поворота, не совсем рентабельно.
Умения экипажа Emil II
Умение «снайпер» особенно важна для такой модели танка как Emil 1, благодаря этому может быть нанесен критический урон противнику. Умения «плавный ход» и «плавный поворот башни» также очень важны для экипажа, так как их сочетание значительно повышает навык стрельбы на ходу. Также стоит обратить внимание на умение «король бездорожья», благодаря чему повысится маневренность машины, а вот таран в данном случае окажется совершенно бесполезным. Для улучшения обзора стоит устанавливать «орлиный глаз» и «радиоперехват». «Бесконтактная боеукладка» также не окажется лишней.
Краткий итог по танку Emil II
Что получаем в итоге: посредственное бронирования тяжелого танка Швеции, где имеется барабанная система заряжания на EMIL II, что привлечет многих игроков и при отличные УВН.
Вариант тяжёлого танка, разработанный в рамках проекта 1949 года по созданию новой машины. К 1952 году было предложено три проекта тяжёлого танка. EMIL 1952 E2 был вторым вариантом. В зависимости от бронирования и установленного двигателя масса данной машины варьировалась от 34 до 39 тонн. Однако в конце 1952 года от версии Е2 отказались в пользу варианта Е3, который имел схожие характеристики при более мощном бронировании.
Экипаж
Модули
Технические характеристики
Огневая мощь
Мобильность
Живучесть
Наблюдение
Время последовательной дозарядки каждого снаряда в магазин
Доработанная система позволяет уменьшить базовое время дозарядки следующего снаряда при отстреле заряженного снаряда после соответствующей индикации
Технические характеристики указаны для осадного режима.
Технические характеристики указаны для режима раскрученной турбины.
Технические характеристики указаны для скоростного режима.
Время зарядки первого и второго орудия на технике со спаренной орудийной установкой
Время починки выведенной из строя основной/резервной гусеницы
Технические характеристики указаны для техники с уровнем обучения экипажа 100%.
Emil II
Emil II
3,550,000  Cost |
| 1700 340 HP Hit Points |
| 37.65/38 24.33/40 t Weight Limit |
| 420 550 hp Engine Power |
| 56/18 km/h Speed Limit |
| 27 30 deg/s Traverse |
| 11.16 22.61 hp/t Power/Wt Ratio |
| No No Pivot |
Shell Cost
Burst Length: 1 rounds
Magazine Size: 3 rounds
Cycle Time: 3 s
Magazine Reload Times
Nominal: 22 s
50% Crew: 28 s
75% Crew: 24.64 s
100% Crew: 22 s
With Vents: 21.5 s
With Vents and BiA: 21.09 s
Click here for more information.
Burst Length: 1 rounds
Magazine Size: 3 rounds
Cycle Time: 3 s
Magazine Reload Times
Nominal: 25 s
50% Crew: 31.82 s
75% Crew: 28 s
100% Crew: 25 s
With Vents: 24.43 s
With Vents and BiA: 23.97 s
Click here for more information.
Using Shell Type 1 (360 Damage):
Theoretical Damage Per Minute
Nominal: 2581.2
50% Crew: 2415.6
75% Crew: 2505.6
100% Crew: 2581.2
With Vents: 2599.2
With Vents and BiA: 2610
Advantageous Damage Per Minute
Loaded-mag DPM: 2858.4
50% Crew: 2743.2
75% Crew: 2808
100% Crew: 2858.4
With Vents: 2869.2
With Vents and BiA: 2880
Click here for more information.
Using Shell Type 2 (360 Damage):
Theoretical Damage Per Minute
Nominal: 2581.2
50% Crew: 2415.6
75% Crew: 2505.6
100% Crew: 2581.2
With Vents: 2599.2
With Vents and BiA: 2610
Advantageous Damage Per Minute
Loaded-mag DPM: 2858.4
50% Crew: 2743.2
75% Crew: 2808
100% Crew: 2858.4
With Vents: 2869.2
With Vents and BiA: 2880
Click here for more information.
Using Shell Type 3 (460 Damage):
With wholly penetrating hits
Theoretical Damage Per Minute
Nominal: 3298.2
50% Crew: 3086.6
75% Crew: 3201.6
100% Crew: 3298.2
With Vents: 3321.2
With Vents and BiA: 3335
Advantageous Damage Per Minute
Loaded-mag DPM: 3652.4
50% Crew: 3505.2
75% Crew: 3588
100% Crew: 3652.4
With Vents: 3666.2
With Vents and BiA: 3680
Click here for more information.
Using Shell Type 1 (440 Damage):
Theoretical Damage Per Minute
Nominal: 2992
50% Crew: 2824.8
75% Crew: 2917.2
100% Crew: 2992
With Vents: 3009.6
With Vents and BiA: 3018.4
Advantageous Damage Per Minute
Loaded-mag DPM: 3282.4
50% Crew: 3172.4
75% Crew: 3229.6
100% Crew: 3282.4
With Vents: 3291.2
With Vents and BiA: 3300
Click here for more information.
Using Shell Type 2 (440 Damage):
Theoretical Damage Per Minute
Nominal: 2992
50% Crew: 2824.8
75% Crew: 2917.2
100% Crew: 2992
With Vents: 3009.6
With Vents and BiA: 3018.4
Advantageous Damage Per Minute
Loaded-mag DPM: 3282.4
50% Crew: 3172.4
75% Crew: 3229.6
100% Crew: 3282.4
With Vents: 3291.2
With Vents and BiA: 3300
Click here for more information.
Using Shell Type 3 (530 Damage):
With wholly penetrating hits
Theoretical Damage Per Minute
Nominal: 3604
50% Crew: 3402.6
75% Crew: 3513.9
100% Crew: 3604
With Vents: 3625.2
With Vents and BiA: 3635.8
Advantageous Damage Per Minute
Loaded-mag DPM: 3953.8
50% Crew: 3821.3
75% Crew: 3890.2
100% Crew: 3953.8
With Vents: 3964.4
With Vents and BiA: 3975
Click here for more information.
With 50% Crew: 0.446 m
With 75% Crew: 0.389 m
With 100% Crew: 0.345 m
With BiA: 0.338 m
With BiA and Vents: 0.33 m
Maximum possible: 0.317 m
For more details, see Crew
With 50% Crew: 0.471 m
With 75% Crew: 0.411 m
With 100% Crew: 0.364 m
With BiA: 0.356 m
With BiA and Vents: 0.349 m
Maximum possible: 0.334 m
For more details, see Crew
With 50% Crew: 3.716 s
With 75% Crew: 3.245 s
With 100% Crew: 2.877 s
With GLD: 2.615 s
With BiA: 2.813 s
With BiA and Vents: 2.752 s
With both and GLD: 2.502 s
Maximum possible: 2.398 s
For more details, see Crew or Equipment
With 50% Crew: 3.469 s
With 75% Crew: 3.029 s
With 100% Crew: 2.685 s
With GLD: 2.441 s
With BiA: 2.626 s
With BiA and Vents: 2.569 s
With both and GLD: 2.335 s
Maximum possible: 2.238 s
For more details, see Crew or Equipment
With 50% Crew: 298.6 m
With 75% Crew: 339.3 m
With 100% Crew: 380 m
With Recon and Situational Awareness: 399.2 m
With Coated Optics: 418 m
With Binocular Telescope: 475 m
Maximum possible: 544 m
For more details, see Skills or Equipment
With 50% Crew: 298.6 m
With 75% Crew: 339.3 m
With 100% Crew: 380 m
With Recon and Situational Awareness: 399.2 m
With Coated Optics: 418 m
With Binocular Telescope: 475 m
Maximum possible: 544 m
For more details, see Skills or Equipment
With 50% Crew: 557.8 m
With 75% Crew: 634 m
With 100% Crew: 710 m
With 100% Signal Boost: 852 m
When affected by 100% Relaying: 781 m
Maximum possible: 1021.6 m
For more details, see Skills or Equipment
With 50% Crew: 667.8 m
With 75% Crew: 759 m
With 100% Crew: 850 m
With 100% Signal Boost: 1020 m
When affected by 100% Relaying: 935 m
Maximum possible: 1223.1 m
For more details, see Skills or Equipment
The Emil II is a Swedish tier 9 heavy tank.
A variant of the heavy tank developed under the project of 1949. In 1952, three heavy tank projects were proposed. The EMIL 1952 E2 was the second variant. Depending on the armor and mounted engine, the weight of the vehicle varied from 34 to 39 tons. However, at the end of 1952, development of the E2 version was discontinued in favor of the E3 version, which had similar characteristics but improved armor.
The Emil II leads to the Kranvagn.
Modules / Available Equipment and Consumables
Modules
| Tier | Gun | Penetration (mm) | Damage (HP) | Rate of fire (rounds/minute) | Dispersion (m/100m) | Aiming time (s) | Weight (kg) | Price ( ) |
|---|
Engines
| Tier | Engine | Engine Power (hp) | Chance of Fire on Impact (%) | Weight (kg) | Price ( ) |
|---|
Suspensions
| Tier | Suspension | Load Limit (т) | Traverse Speed (gr/sec) | R min | Weight (kg) | Price ( ) |
|---|
Radios
Compatible Equipment
Compatible Consumables
Player Opinion
Pros and Cons
— Virtually impenetrable frontal turret armor with extremely small weakspots
— Great burst damage on top gun with acceptable penetration
— Decent mobility for a heavy
— Surprisingly good base view range; with good equipment and skills it can effectively spot on its own
— Relatively easy stock grind, as its stock gun has decent penetration and good burst damage, and also doesn’t have additional turret to research
— Fast reload with top cannon (25 seconds) for 3 clip autoloader of 440 damage a shot, above average for a 12cm cannon, for around 2,555 damage per minute, a substantial buff from update 1.5
— Weak hull armor overall, with very poor side and rear armor
— Subpar penetration on HEAT round (300mm), unable to deal with superheavies reliably
— Tied with FV4005 for the worst gun elevation in the game (8 degrees), shooting an enemy at high places and when the tank is downhill is very difficult
— Long aiming time (2.6 seconds) with subpar accuracy (0.36 dispersion)
Performance
Emil II is very similar to its predecessor in terms of play style. The most notable difference is massively improved gun and even better turret armor, while it still maintains the 12 degrees of gun depression. It is best used at mid-range combat in hull-down positions where the hull is protected and the turret is the only part exposed. The turret is one of the strongest in the tier, and can easily bounce all standard and most premium shells. However, premium ammo from tier X destroyers and high calibre HE shells can and will get through, so beware.
Emil II should be played as a support or on ridges, preferably with other tanks nearby. Fighting alone can lead to quick death as soon as enemies realize that you are reloading, so be cautious. Also be aware of artillery as they will punish you if you stay in focus for too long.
Early Research
The cannon is the main priority, as it is just better than the stock cannon. After that, any order of research is fine, but most important (after the top cannon is researched) is engine and tracks to improve mobility.
Suggested Equipment
External Reviews and Opinions
Gallery
Historical Info
The EMIL project started out in 1951 as more of a medium tank, but in 1952, the army, like other western nations, decided that they needed something to counter the Soviet IS-3 heavy tank and it was this line of thought, that would above all else shape the EMIL project after 1951.
The main inspiration for the design seems to have been drawn, initially at least, from the French and German tank designs – more specifically from the new AMX 13, which had recently been tested in Sweden, as well as the German Panther. The influence of these tanks can be seen in the addition of a French style oscillating turret with an autoloader and the well-sloped frontal glacis. But in 1952, as the design was being reworked, it was decided to borrow the Soviet idea of the pike nose in order to increase the effective thickness even further.
Although all were based around the same principles, there were several different variants of the EMIL, specificially there were three main ones. First was the E1, which was to correspond with the 1951 proposal, but with the new pike nose front and with an American tank engine instead of a Swedish one. The second design was called E2 and was a sort of a middle range model, which would be heavier than the E1, but also would be able to carry a 15cm smoothbore instead of the 12cm rifled gun, planned for the earlier models. The E2 was also able to sport a bigger engine and this design was considered as the most realistic one, since there was no guarantee that a bigger engine could be acquired. Last was the E3, which was the top range model with a weight of over 40 tons and an American 810hp engine, this was at the time seen as a bit too heavy and unrealistic, but as the engine became available, this design was chosen and two hulls were built in 1955.
A chart with various models
Some of the other variables that separated the designs included front and side armor for the hull and turret, engine output, main armament and suspension. In the case of frontal armor, there was a choice of either having a 120mm hull and 140mm turret armor or 145mm hull and 170mm turret armor, these thicknesses were specifically chosen to be able to withstand a frontal hit from the IS-3 heavy tank with either (in the first case) regular AP ammo or (in the latter) subcaliber ammo. Side armor was divided into 3 options: first was a 20mm hull and 40mm turret, 2nd was a 30mm hull and 60mm turret and third was a 40mm hull and 80mm turret. The rest of the armor was common to all variants of the tank. This included the hull roof, driver’s port (middle front glacis) and floor. The rear armor was 30mm for all the variants except for the one with 40mm side armor, where the rear was also 40mm thick.
One of the most important variables was the engine output. As mentioned before, the engines considered were American tank engines, mainly from Continental. These included the AOS-195 (500hp), AV-1195 (540hp), AVS-1195 (665-668hp) and AV-1790 (810hp) models. Initially, it was thought that the acquisition of the more powerful engines wouldn’t be possible and therefore initial projections favored a middle range tank model in both weight and armor, but as negotiations continued, an example of the 810hp was acquired and considered for licensed production at SFA (the Swedish aircraft engine company). This meant that there were no longer any problems with the engine output for the tank and that the development of the top range model could be pursued. However, as the development of the tank continued, it was decided to use a Swedish engine instead, as one of sufficient power had been developed at SFA. The new engine was very powerful at around 900hp, but the power required to run the cooling system meant that when it was finally tested on the prototypes in 1955, it could only deliver 723hp with the rest being used up by the cooling system itself.
Even before 1951, studies had been made regarding the armament of what would become the EMIL project. These studies had concluded that the best armament for a future tank project would be a high caliber gun (12cm or higher) in order to effectively use HEAT shells. But these were no regular HEAT shells – in fact the Swedish idea was to mix the properties of APDS and HEAT to create a heat shell with a discarding sabot. This would allow the shell to travel much faster than a normal HEAT shell. Ultimately, the development of these munitions would prove impossible for Sweden and would be a major reason behind the cancellation of the project. The actual gun considered to use this kind of shell was at first a 12cm L/40 rifled gun and later a 15cm L/40 smoothbore gun. Besides the HEAT shells, these guns were to fire mainly HE, although there were plans for APDS ammunition as well. There were also plans for a 10,5cm gun in case the development of the previously mentioned guns would prove too complicated. One thing of note is that the 150mm gun is not viable for World of Tanks, as it is a smoothbore.
Drawing comparing the different gun options
Suspension was another thing that varied quite a bit between the different designs. We know that there were plans for up to 8 roadwheels per side, but the final prototypes ended up with 6 per side.
I should state however that some changes were made to the EMIL project after the completion of the prototypes in 1955. The main change was to the turret armor which was changed from the planned 170/80/40 to 170/70/30 in order to stabilize the gun better, elevation also changed from +8/-12 to +10/-12. Other than that, there were plans to potentially mount a British or French gun on the vehicle in 1958 after the development of a suitable Swedish one had failed.
So to summarize, the Emil was to be a heavily armored but mobile tank with a weight of under 50 tons and a 10,5-15cm gun, capable of dealing with the IS-3 at long range. So you might be thinking, why was it that this tank never entered production? Well, initially the idea was that this tank would replace the WW2 vintage Strv m/42, but the gap between the two tanks would mean that Sweden would be without a modern tank during most of the 1950′s, until a production version of the EMIL was ready. What happened instead was that Sweden purchased the British Centurion tank as a stopgap measure and with the development of the L7 gun in the late 50′, there was no longer a need for the EMIL project. However, some work continued on the prototype chassis which had been named “Kranvagn” (crane vehicle) to confuse any potential spy.
Akv 151 prototype SPG
Work on a new 15cm autoloading SPG had been in progress since before the EMIL project and a version based on the EMIL hull had been in the work since the start of the project. After the initial testing in 1955-1956, it was decided that one of the prototype hulls would be converted to this SPG configuration. This vehicle prototype was built in 1960 and would eventually become the Bkan 1, but that is a story for another time
There was also an idea to mount the Centurion Mk.10 turret on the Krv chassis in order to create a competitor to the Centurion Mk.10, but in the end, the Swedish army decided that it would be simpler if they just purchased the whole Centurion Mk.10 instead. However there were also plans to let a vehicle in this configuration serve as a prototype for future turreted tank concepts in Sweden, but nothing ever came of this. Instead, the remaining prototype had 4 of its roadwheels removed and was fitted with equipment for testing of the hydraulic suspension as well as a fixed 20pdr gun and was used as a test rig for the S-tank. This prototype chassis still exist in the Arsenalen museum, although it’s currently in storage and not on display.
Interpretation of the Centurion/Kranvagn hybrid
Kranvagn chassis during suspension testing for the S tank project
Last time the Krv chassis was seen by the public was its move to the new Arsenalen museeum storage